Kids researchers and marketers told to put themselves in Check
‘Check’ – the Children’s Ethical Communications Kit – is designed to provide easy access to all the rules companies need to be aware of when researching or marketing to kids.
Geoff Gosling, chairman of the Market Research Society’s (MRS) Standards Board, said: “We have been involved in developing the website by supplying our recently updated, and toughened, MRS code rules on children’s research.
“To complement the new rules MRS has also issued new best-practice guidelines on conducting research with children, which are currently out for consultation with the sector.”
Culture minister Ed Vaizey welcomed the launch of the website, saying the government “fully supports this important work”.
“Childhood should be free of excessive commercialisation and inappropriate content,” said Vaizey. “Fortunately the UK advertising industry has a good track record in taking its responsibilities seriously, and this industry-led initiative is further evidence of that.”
Marketing to children is one of the key issues being looked at by the government’s childhood and families task force. Launching the task force in June, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said: “We are committed to cracking down on irresponsible advertising and marketing… If we are really going to restore and protect the innocence of childhood, action here is absolutely key.”
We hope you enjoyed this article.
Research Live is published by MRS.
The Market Research Society (MRS) exists to promote and protect the research sector, showcasing how research delivers impact for businesses and government.
Members of MRS enjoy many benefits including tailoured policy guidance, discounts on training and conferences, and access to member-only content.
For example, there's an archive of winning case studies from over a decade of MRS Awards.
Find out more about the benefits of joining MRS here.
1 Comment
Ray Poynter
15 years ago
Speaking as a parent I find the proposed/draft MRS code much too soft, too much in favour of clients and too little in favour of families or specifically children. Amongst my beefs are: a) it permits research in school. This is not why we send our children to school. The rules say parental permission 'may' be asked, but teacher or head is allowed. No way! (I am happy for some social research to be conducted in schools, but not commercial research). b) it allows a researcher who discovers a child in in harm (for example being molested) to report it under some circumstances. No way! It should be a duty to ensure that either the police or social services are alerted, not an option that the researcher may choose if they wish. c) I believe that any research that facilitates the marketing of products at children should be ruled by the code as unethical. Do we really want MR to be associated with trying to get children to eat more junk, drink more junk, or to pester parents into buying things that might not be affordable? Let us hope that it will not be too much longer before the government bans the marketing of products at children altogether, but until then we should recognise that helping this kind of marketing is not ethical. I think we need to think like parents, not like businesspeople on this occasion.
Like Reply Report